Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Unanswered Discussions - SAP ERP Manufacturing - Production Planning (SAP PP)
Viewing all 1841 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Different behaviour of MRP when running background and when running foreground

November 7, 2015, 10:56 am
$
0
0

Good evening.

I am facing a strange situation regarding MRP: it shows different behavior when background than of when running foreground. To be more specific:

 

MRP runs at plant 2900. There is a Production Order for the finished material. When MRP runs in background (transaction MDBT, variant 2900,

image 1) it does not plan all BOM materials (material 120800323 for example, image 2). But, when I run MRP from withing MD04 (MD02)  procurement proposals are created (material 120070748 for example, image 3).

 

Has anyone of you come across this??? Any suggestions????

Thank you very much,

Nikos Giannopoulos

 

Image 1

11.jpg

 

Image 2

 

22.jpg

Image 3

 

33.jpg

↧
Search

Capacity Planning - Versions of available capacity

November 8, 2015, 9:26 am
$
0
0

Hello all,

 

I have a work centre set up and I am using 2 versions of capacity - 01 which is the normal available capacity and 03 which is the maximum.

I have set up the intervals and shifts and in the work centre capacity header, when I change the active version, the system schedules correctly.

 

Now my question is this: In CM01 - if I select detailed capacity list and settings/general, in there I can choose which capacity version I wish to use. However when you execute this it makes no difference, it does not override the work centre capacity header setting.

 

I can not see the point of having this option as it does not seem to do what I expected.

 

Any comments appreciated.

 

Gerry

↧
↧

Batch Search Strategy in REM MFBF: same batch determined for 261 and 531

November 8, 2015, 12:13 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I have a requirement in a Toll REM Manufacturing where I had to search and determine the same batch number assigned to 261 movement type and 531 movement type, with same quantity assigned in both.

 

For example, I had batch 0002893098 with Prod. Date (DD.MM.YYYY) as 01.10.2015 and SLED as 31.12.2015

 

I had maintained IMG settings and data in order to search and determined by SLED date, for 531 and 261. However, I noticed that 531 is been determined first and right, while batch determination for 261 is failing.

 

My "reason" to point out same batch and quantity under 261 and 531 is that, after I consumed it on my REM backflushing, I need to return it back to client as an symbolic return (Brazil scenario for toll manufacturing) without costs on consumption/generation.

 

Could you please gave me some directions?

 

Best Regards to you all,

 

Paulo Gomes

↧

WM-PP interface - costs missing --> staging not done

November 8, 2015, 2:49 pm
$
0
0

Tothegether with a PP consultant, I face the following issue:

Given PP orders, for which WM pick parts are to be taken from the warehouse. We only can do this if first the costing is finished.

 

I don't see:

* Is what we see right : does costing NEED to be finished before we can stage?

* If yes: Why costing already needs to be done? Practically, the production process is long - and not all component costs are know when production starts

* If no - where can we switch this off??

* Or... are we on the wrong track?

 

Thanks for any help!!!

 

Jan

↧

batch determination based on fifo for consumption

November 8, 2015, 10:17 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I am looking for a scenario where my client moves a batch managed raw material to silo. And from there the silo is connected to machine. On goods declaration component back flushing is happening automatically.

 

My client is looking for the consumption in the sequence it was loaded in silo. It's fifo on silo level.

 

Further, if in a day they are loading 10 bags .. is sequence bag no 3,1,2,4,6,5,7,8,10,9  then theconsumption should also happen in the same sequence.

 

How can that be done. I made a characteristics assigned it with GR DATE of mch1. But this is working for a day posting but it's not working for the bags sequence in a day....

 

Rrgards

Cr

↧
↧

Default Requirement value

November 8, 2015, 10:36 pm
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

As per our configuration in procurement tab it has to pick default as CV 011 for Sales document item category TAN & BVN but it is taking CV KEV.

 

It is working well in Development server but in Production server it is not working.

 

Please help me how can i resolve the issue.

Screenshot.jpg.

↧

Not getting all batches that are available while checking using CL30N

November 9, 2015, 12:18 am
$
0
0

Hi SAP Gurus,

 

When I use T.code CL30N for a Class and Class type to find Object in classes for a vendor batch number (to find material batches for vendor batch number)  I am not getting all batches available in this list (ie., in Find objects in class) 

 

Since when I check one batch using MSC3N, I could see the same vendor batch number (but this is not getting displayed in CL30N).

 

I request your valuable inputs to overcome this issue.

 

I have attached screenshot of CL30N and MSC3N

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Best Regards,

 

R.Velmurugan.

↧

Develop a report from CO47

November 9, 2015, 12:39 am
$
0
0

Hi Guru,

 

We will try to develop a new reporting program with using the output from CO47. Right now we are doing simulation production order for our manufacturing.

 

We want to compare an original PP order vs to the Simulation PP order using CO47 to check those missing components and difference between the two.

 

Can you help share any FM that we can use to develop such for this CO47. thanks.

↧
Search

MS04 order tree can't show follow-up material correctly

November 9, 2015, 2:24 am
$
0
0

Dear all,

 

    When I check MS04 result, I find that it can't show the plan order which includes follow-up material correctly, could someone tell me why? Thanks!

    MS04, cursor on the plan order, then click button "Show Overview Tree", I find there are only 6 materials output. (see picture )

    Check the plan order MD13, there are 8 materials (include follow up materials, see picture).

 

     Btw, MD04 is normal.

 

BR,

Microfish

 

消息编辑者为：microfish Hung

↧
↧

Long text does not exist -->CP725 in CA02

November 9, 2015, 3:02 am
$
0
0

Hello experts, In CA02, although the long text exist for am operacion (screenshot 1), SAP says it doesn't (screenshot 2). Does anybody knows why this is happening ans how to solve it? Thanks.

↧

Change of currency type over existing Activity

November 9, 2015, 3:12 am
$
0
0

Dear Expert ,

 

 

We have created activity type against cost element with currency  "INR" but it should be "BDT " . How do I change the existing Activity ?

 

Regards,

Amit Biswas

↧

CSAI_BOM_MAINTAIN issues when I change WBS BOM

November 9, 2015, 6:27 am
$
0
0

Hi gurus,

I have a customer that uses WBS BOM. THe BOM's are created using T4S Engine.

If I create a BOM for first time, I don't have any issue. If I want to update this BOM with new component or delete component that already exist, I have a lot of issues... The BOM is not updated correctly

DO you have how I can use this BAPI in order to change / delete component in WBS BOM?

Thanks

Regards

Raffaele

↧

Production orders with "CLOSE" or "TECO" status without confirmations

November 9, 2015, 10:09 am
$
0
0

Hi experts,

 

When a production orden has "TECO" or "CLOSE" status I need that no-one is able to make confirmations to this production order


I need the confirmatios to be blocked while production order has "CLOSE" or TECO status

 

How I can get this?


Best regards,


Arnulfo Cordero Pradel

↧
↧

Multi-level Bom change using ECM, conflict in application date

November 9, 2015, 11:03 am
$
0
0

Hello,

 

We have changes in our products that are scheduled with ECM (CC01).  Our products has multi-level boms.  When we change multiple components at different levels of the receipe, the change "valid date" from CC01 seems only based on the component requirement date.

 

This cause some production order to have some new component and some old components at the same time, because the requirement date is not the same through all bom levels...

 

Is there a way to change this to make sure we're not having this conflict?

 

An example would be to use the validity date of ECM based on PP order creation date instead or requirement date...

 

Any suggestions would be appreciated!

 

Thanks!

 

 

 

Ex:

A: finish good

B component 1

C Component 2

D subassembly 1

 

A

     B req date 01.15.2016

     D req date 01.15.2016

          C Req date 01.10.2016

 

If B and C have the same change number (CC01) which is effective 01.12.2016; the production order would contain at the same time 2 recipe

↧

ECM effectivity date change VS Planning file entry

November 9, 2015, 11:19 am
$
0
0

When I moving effectivity dates on a change modification document (CC02) affected to BOM; there are no flag that are set in the planning file entry.

 

I'm getting planned orders and Purchase requisition that are not updated with my change.

 

My material has

Planning type PD

Lot sizing Ex...

and subcontracted

F-30

OR

Plannig type M3

Lot size Ex

Collective order

E-52...

 

Other than schedule MRP NEUPL daily, is there something else I should do nto activate the "Bom explosion indicator" in the planning file entry?

 

Please let me know my options...

 

Regards!

 

I'm on ECC 6

↧
Search

Fert configuration instance (MARC-CUOBJ) Vs schedule changes

November 9, 2015, 1:02 pm
$
0
0

Is there a way, with or without ECM, to change some characteristic values into a fert configurator instance (MARC-CUOBJ) for a future date?

 

There only in MM02 that we can change characteristic values.  But it's present time.

I tried using MM12 and the field is not there...

 

Dear experts, please let me know the possible options...

 

Regards!

 

 

Luc

↧

How to see how track change of a process order?

November 9, 2015, 8:34 pm
$
0
0

Hi PP Guru,

 

It is quite a basic question.

 

I'd like to see the change document of a process order.

 

Please let me know how.

 

Thank you,

 

Sally

↧
↧

Order reservation and po date

November 10, 2015, 6:17 am
$
0
0

Hi all

 

For your help. .I created PO for finished goid with date 11.12.2015 and in the components order reservation is created on the date which by system. .now when i changed the po date in fg to 11.11.2015 the order reservation date in the components still 11.12 2015...why iş it no changing?

 

Tx help

↧

Execução MRP VS Localização Brasil

November 10, 2015, 9:29 am
$
0
0

Hello everyone.

 

 

 

Recently we activated the MRP based on consumption. But when the MRP create a purchase requisition automatically, data from Aba Brazil are not filled. But when the purchase requisition is manually created this data is populated. as the attachment.

 

 

Anyone know how to solve this problem

 

 

Best regards

Sergio

↧

HU Palletization-Pack in REM

November 10, 2015, 11:19 am
$
0
0

I use HUP1 transaction and based on ship to party ,the HU proposals  are shown as how many of pallets of each type  (Pack instruction ) and qty of material on it.

say 10 nos materials total in 2 pallets  .

system shows based on POP3 and POF3=> 1 pallet (std) 6 nos and 1 pallet (nonstd) 4 nos.

 

a) How could I get the same (HU Proposal) by entering  a sales order instead of ship to party.?

b) Is it possible to change the logic in SAP in HUP1 to propose the types of "Pack Instruction" (HU Proposal) based on our own logic of arriving at no of pallets and qty/pallet.?

↧
Viewing all 1841 articles
Browse latest View live
Search

Latest Images

7 clever tricks Primark does to keep you walking & buying more than you need...

7 clever tricks Primark does to keep you walking & buying more than you need...

July 20, 2025, 5:14 am
Art for Everyone! Autism advocacy, local stories, and indigenous pride in one...

Art for Everyone! Autism advocacy, local stories, and indigenous pride in one...

July 20, 2025, 5:06 am
Paintings of English Downs 2

Paintings of English Downs 2

July 20, 2025, 4:30 am
How Kerala Women Rescued a Dying Forest and Turned It Into a Safe Haven for...

How Kerala Women Rescued a Dying Forest and Turned It Into a Safe Haven for...

July 20, 2025, 3:30 am
Met Eireann warns of heavy rain & spot flooding for DAYS before big...

Met Eireann warns of heavy rain & spot flooding for DAYS before big...

July 20, 2025, 1:14 am
Who is Kevin Lerena’s wife Geraldine?

Who is Kevin Lerena’s wife Geraldine?

July 20, 2025, 12:57 am
Man stabs woman, baby to death inside Queens home, police say

Man stabs woman, baby to death inside Queens home, police say

July 19, 2025, 11:00 pm
Ang papel ni whistleblower Julie Patidongan sa kaso ng mga nawawalang sabungero

Ang papel ni whistleblower Julie Patidongan sa kaso ng mga nawawalang sabungero

July 19, 2025, 9:45 pm
Telangana Human Rights Commission (TGHRC) seeks report from revenue dept on...

Telangana Human Rights Commission (TGHRC) seeks report from revenue dept on...

July 19, 2025, 7:29 pm
Crisis-hit NHS fat cats raking in MASSIVE salaries as frontline services cry...

Crisis-hit NHS fat cats raking in MASSIVE salaries as frontline services cry...

July 19, 2025, 2:11 pm
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>