Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Unanswered Discussions - SAP ERP Manufacturing - Production Planning (SAP PP)
Viewing all 1841 articles
Browse latest View live

Discontinuation part and follow-up material

$
0
0

100414622 is material to be continued, while A5E34952544 is the follow-up material

321.jpg

material 100414622 has been consumed up before 2016. when order is created today by user, the 100414622 isn't be replaced at first

搜狗截图20160510193634.jpg搜狗截图20160510193736.jpg

2 hours later, material 100414622 is replaced by A5E34952544. There is no background job running and change action on this order in these 2 hours.

搜狗截图20160510194206.jpg

Could any expert could explain this issue, thank you very much!


AFKO- CUOBJ (internal object number) field blank for production order

$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

I have a issue where, the CUOBJ field for the production order is blank.

and this field is being refered in ABAP program, i am getting error

"Inconsistent input data when calling module/method CUCB_GET_SINGLE_INSTANCE

Message no. CUIB1007"

Can some one let me know where to maintain CUOBJ field for order so that i can avoid this message.

Past dated Planned orders

$
0
0

Hi experts

what is the reason for deleting past dated planned orders in SAP ECC system? Any business reasons. If the past date planned orders are not deleted will they interfere in the MRP plan run.Can you plz elaborate purpose of deleting. Till what date the deletion needs to be done.

 

Thanks

Sakthi

Remove confirmed operation from CM21

$
0
0

Dear Experts

 

Is there any standard way to remove the Confirmed operation  from The CM21 capacity leveling

 

Regards

 

Hussam Ghanem

PP Notification with HR Validation

$
0
0

Hello.

 

My client request is to know who person it is working in which process order.

 

In order to answer this request, I already did the following in SAP

 

a) Create a resource type 008 in transaction CRC1

b) Into the tab Capacity, create the 002 capacity in order to assign three person to that work center.

c) The HR consultant assign the infotype 0315 to this employee

d) Create the process order with the resource I create.

e) Do the confirmation with the transaction COR6N

 

Until this stpe everything looks good.

 

But.

 

When I open the button for employee at COR6N the system allow me to assign ANY employee not only the three I assign into the resource.

 

Could you guide me about what I forget to do.

 

The system validate the work center information into the confirmation, if the answer is YES please tell me how.

 

Thanks in advances.

stock under control

$
0
0

Hi,

 

We have case were we want finished stock is to bebe under control for issue against a respectively sales order or STPO.

How it can be done. We dont want pure MTO strategy or quality inspection.

Assigning group of employees/personnels to the work-centre and choosing someone in the order(before confirmation)

$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

We have a requirement to map group of workers to the different work-centres(one employee can work on multiple work-centres), and this work-centres to be used in the production order. Now, at any point of time manager would extract a report to see who(employee) is working on which order.

 

I found some threads to create a work-centre hierarchy or we can assign a personnel (one or more than one) to the work-centre/capacity (via HRMS), but I am not sure how to choose the person who will be working one this in the production order from the group and also not sure if there is any standard report available to display all the jobs assigned to an employee so that manager can access it readily or we may have to go for z report.

 

Please let me know your suggestions on this.

 

Thanks in advance.

Adnan Waseem

Transfer of requirements to MRP

$
0
0

In current setup system doesn't transfer sales order requirement to MRP (MD04) if it is not confirmed by ATP. So non confirmed sales order do not appear in MD04 screen and nightly MRP job do not create dependent planned order to fulfill that requirement. This is fine.

 

Now issue in case of stock transfer PO. Even though they are not confirmed by ATP, stock transfer PO do appear in MD04 and MRP do create dependent planned order to full fill that requirement. How can we break this link? Business doesn't want to transfer stock transfer PO requirement to MD04 if it is not confirmed by ATP.

 

Reply appreciated.


Collective printing of spool no

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

Once production order is generated it creates 2 set of documents along with it, production order and GR list. if the both the radio button in spool is selected and give print, then production order goes out of range and GR list fits to A4 page.

 

Why it is going out of range?

 

 

User want to select number of spool for all the production order and print.

Production Confirmation

$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 

Getting an error while posting confirmation of Process Order in COR6N

 

System unable to post goods movement for 101 Mvt type.

 

 

Pls give ur valuable inputs.

 

Thanks,

Raj

CO11N Activity Types do not update

$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 

we are using a custom confirmation profile for CO11N. When entering the yield quantity, activities like "setup", "machine" or "labor" are not updated by the system. We first have to click "Actual Data" to get the values for the activity types. When we adjust the yield quantity from let's say "10 PC" to "5 PC", the values do not update and remain the same. The profile "SAP_STANDARD" (CORUPROF parameter "null") shows the right behaviour (the system immediately updates activities when entering/changing quantities). We need this behaviour for our custom profile.

 

These are the settings we made in SPRO so far, any ideas what's missing?

 

param_ord_conf.PNG

 

OPK0.PNG

 

coruprof.PNG

 

Thanks in advance!

GR MIGO not possible for WIP Batch

$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 

we use WIP batches for subcontracting. We are in the process step to receive back the processed material from the vendor. We are trying to perform a GR against the purchase order in MIGO (Movement types 101 and 543, see screenshots). The wip batch is currently in the vendor stock ("stock provided to the vendor"), so the GR should move the wip batch back to "blocked stock".

 

When we try to post the GR, we receive an error popup by the system and the booking is not possible.

We also tried posting the GR with CO11n, but we get an COGI entry for the consumption of the wip batch from vendor stock (movement failed).

 

MIGO.png

 

popup.PNG

 

 

 

 

 

The long text says:

 

Combination of movement type/special stock/stock type is not possible

Message No. M7361


Diagnosis

The combination of movement type, special stock, and stock type (or batch status) is not defined. You may be trying to post stock to a stock type that is not defined for this stock (for example, blocked stock of material to be provided to vendor or returns blocked stock for sales order stock do not exist in the SAP System).

 

Procedure

If you have entered this data yourself, correct it.

If the system automatically determined the data (for example, if it tried to post the stock to QI stock because of a quality inspection check), inform your system administrator.

 

Procedure for System Administration

The entry MAO3 3 is missing from table T156M (quantity posting string).

Do not enter it yourself. It is a system table.

If the user did not enter the data manually, you have to find out how this combination resulted. When posting a goods movement via the MB_CREATE_GOODS_MOVEMENT function module or the method GoodsMovement.CreateFromData, the person calling them up has to check whether the transferred combination of movement type/special stock/stock type (or batch status) is supported by the system.

 

 

Any ideas?

Electricity production and byproducts

$
0
0

Dear Gurus,

 

I need to implement the below process for a client. Need your expertise.

My client has a power generation plant. Where electricity is the final product. The process is as below -

 

Stage1 - Limestone and Petcoke goes into boiler and steam produces.
Stage2 - Steam from stage1 creates electricity.

 

My client want to inventorize TPP petcoke which is the by product. But they do not want to show any inventory for steam or electricity.

 

Q1 . How can I then show TPP petcoke as a byproduct then?

Q2 . The price of TPP petcoke should be deducted from production cost( petcoke + limestone cost). Rest of the amount should be considered as production cost of electricity.

System is not asking for batch number during goods issue in MIGO against process order

$
0
0

Hi Team,

 

I need help on the below issue. I have a component material where the batch entry field is blank in MRP2 view of the material master. I don't have any batch determination set up at Inventory management level. So when process order released there is no batch allocated in the order for this component since the batch suppose to be entered at the time of goods issue. But when user performed the goods issue in MIGO forget to enter the batch number and clicked on post button. Surprisingly MIGO posted the goods issue and automatically picked the batch as per FEFO strategy. I was expecting that system will through message that "Enter the batch" when clicked on "Check" button.

 

Can you please help me to fix this issue?

 

Thanks

Sandip Chatterjee

Mass GI

$
0
0

Hello,

I would like to know if there is a possibility to create mass GI.

I have 1000 orders - type ZSO3, for which the user has to do GI.

No acces to LSMW.

Thank you!

 

Roxana.


About KANBAN History

$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 

As we all know we can change bin status from full to empty , empty to full etc etc.

 

We can change bin status by PK13N,PK31,LM01 etc

 

My requirement is to find out the user name who has changed bin status along with old and new status and date on which changes were made.

 

I know I can get details such as previous status and new status along with date on which changes have been made but I am looking for getting the user

 

name also.

 

Is there any table or report for this.

MD02 manually is generating PurRqs. but MDBT by background is not

$
0
0

Hello,

 

We have a daily MRP background job (MDBT) in ECC, which runs for all HALB and ROH material, the requirement for which comes from APO.

 

Many of these materials (belonging to MRP type PD) are Shelf Life Planning active, many of them have existing stock/inventory which expiry dates in the near horizon.

 

Now when we run a MRP by MD02, it accounts for the expiry date of the batches, discounting them at their SLED dates and creates a Pur.Rqs after that date.

 

However when we run the same en-masse, by MDBT, keeping the same settings, these materials are not processed in the run (When we check in MD05, it doesn't shows the latest MRP run dates)

 

But when we run it by MD02, it shows in MD05, but when we run by MDBT it doesn't!

 

Whats missing?

 

MDBT settings, successfully runs but no Pur.Rqs are created!

5-11-2016 5-43-56 PM.jpg

 

The Pur.Rqs gets created as seen in below screenshot after running by MD02:

5-11-2016 5-42-47 PM.jpg

Rgds

NK

Stop planned order creation - MRP

$
0
0

Experts,

 

I have a very strange requirement. I have a FG and BOM. when I run MRP, I need system to create dep. requirements for bom components, but system should not create planned order for FG. I understand this looks stupid, but want to see if there is any way to achieve this?

 

The only way I thought was to set SPK 60 for FG , but that is not working too...

 

Note: I dont want to use SPK 50 because I need to sell this FG. The reason for this peculiar requirement  is the execution is done in an external system and the stock is uploaded to SAP on FG as we ship through SAP and we don't care about consumption of components or labor but we need to procure the components through SAP and thats the reason we need BOM explosion.

Automatic Period Split

$
0
0

Dear SAP Gurus,

 

We have assigned a MRP Group to a plant, for this Plant- MRP Group combination a period split indicator has been assigned. A distribution key is assigned to this plant with distribution function “Equal Distribution”

 

The period split is defined such a way it splits the monthly requirement into requirement per day. When I enter the PIR via MD63 in MONTHLY buckets, I would want to see the independent requirements split into days when I see in MD04. But in my case I’m only able to see my requirements per month in MD04 as against daily requirements as expected.

 

I’m able to do the Period Split via MD67, after carrying out the period split through MD67 I’m able to see the requirements split into days in MD04 and also in the MD63- schedule lines.

 

Is there a possibility of this split happening automatic? We have a lot of materials under this MRP group & plant for which we need to see the requirements in days. In MD67 I can do the split for all materials in a particular plant but I would like to know if there is a possibility of this split occurring automatically. 

 

Thanks & Regards,

Sandeep

special procurement key OMD9 setting

$
0
0

dear Gurus,

 

i would like to know if there is any setting / master data setting is required for special procurement setting.

i have set the special procurement key in OMD9 in followed and in master data i have use the special procurement key accordingly (in receiving plant) under MRP 2 Tab > procurement > special procurement, is there any pre requisition required?

 

i have regen and refresh MRP, my demand does not show in the Supplying plant (0002)

 

OMD9 setting as followed:

Plant 0001

Sp Pr Type: M9

 

Procurement Type F

 

Special Procurement U (stock transfer)

Plant 0002

Viewing all 1841 articles
Browse latest View live